![\"US](\"https:\/\/s3-images.ctmedia.io\/media\/article-covers\/article-covers-118439-sam-bankman-fried-trial-telling-story-classic-financial-deceit.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Three circuit judges disputed the former FTX CEO\u2019s claims that the defunct crypto exchange\u2019s investors could have been made whole and wouldn\u2019t have experienced any losses.<\/p>\n
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a formal mandate upholding the conviction and sentence of former FTX CEO Sam \u201cSBF\u201d Bankman-Fried, reducing the number of potential opportunities for being released from prison early.<\/p>\n
On Tuesday, the Second Circuit filed<\/a> a mandate following its June 12 ruling affirming a lower court decision<\/a> convicting the former CEO on seven felony counts and sentencing him to 25 years in federal prison. Three circuit judges disputed Bankman-Fried\u2019s claims in appeals that FTX had \u201csufficient liquidity to ensure that investors were made whole and would not experience any losses\u201d and also upheld a New York court\u2019s $11 billion forfeiture order as part of the criminal case.<\/p>\n \u201cAs the district court recognized, any contention that Bankman-Fried lacked an intent to defraud because he intended to eventually repay his customers was legally misleading and prejudicial because the wire fraud statute encompasses temporary misappropriation of money or property,\u201d said Circuit Judge Barrington D. Parker in the court opinion. \u201cAs the district court made clear, FTX customers were defrauded as soon as Bankman-Fried transferred their money to Alameda regardless of how strongly he believed he might later return the money.\u201d<\/p>\n